jump over navigation bar
OSU Extended CampusOregon State University
official course number and title
Welcome Getting Started Resources Site Map
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Week 4

Roughages

link to previous page in the series link to next page in the series

Instructions for listening to audio clips

Download the QuickTime Player to listen to the audio files.
Read the QuickTime Instructions for installation help.
Download the RealPlayer to listen to the audio files
Instructions are on the RealPlayer download page

Pasture Forages

Text Transcript

Follow along with the audio...

  • In U.S.
    • Significant feedstuff in animal production
      • App. 36% feedstuffs
    • Figure 8.11 – Percentage of land per county as pasture or rangeland in 1987 Census of Ag

      (Click on photo for larger image)

    Figure 8.11 - Percentage of land per county as pasture or rangeland in 1987 Census of Ag

  • Effectiveness of management
    • Measured via forage and animal production per unit of land
  • In U.S. industries
    • Economically significant to beef cattle, dairy cattle, sheep, and horse industries
    • Beef cattle
      • Primarily in cow-calf and stocker operations
    • Dairy cattle
      • Limited for lactating cows
        • High nutrient requirements
        • Limited land area
      • More often for dry-cows and heifers
        • Given available land
    • Sheep
      • Significant source of feed
  • Pasture: an area of land with forage grown for animal consumption via grazing
  • Classification
    • Cultivated or seeded or introduced and native pasture
    • Figure 7-4 on page 132 of the text – Cultivated or introduced and native pasture regions of U.S.
    • Cultivated or seeded
      • Greater than 20” rainfall per year or irrigated
      • Examples include pastures of Midwest, South, East, and irrigated and higher rainfall areas in West
      • Figure 8.12 – Sheep grazing cultivated pasture
    • Figure 8.12 - Sheep grazing cultivated pasture
    • Native
      • Less than 20” of rainfall per year
      • Native species
        • Not introduced and existed for period of time
    • In general, nutritional value and yield of cultivated pastures higher than native pastures
      • Result of forage species and management
  • Additional classification
    • Permanent
      • Used for many years
      • In general, most profitable use of land
      • Majority of rangelands
    • Semi-permanent
      • Used for number of years
      • Component of crop rotation program
    • Temporary and supplemental
      • Used for a short period of time
      • Often include annual species
  • Pasture and range forages in forage system
    • Advantages
      • Reduced feed cost
      • Reduced cost of facilities
      • Potential for relatively consistent feedstuff of high nutritional value
      • Improved animal health
      • Productive means to use land
    • Disadvantages
      • Potential loss in revenue compared to alternative crops
      • Potential for labor intensive animal management
      • Nutritional value of forages depends on environmental and soil conditions
  • Yield and nutritional value
    • Factors
      • Plant species
      • Environmental and soil conditions
      • Stage of maturity
      • Grazing management
      • Focus on factors specific to pasture systems
  • Grazing management
    • Controls timing and amount of forage grazed to prevent
      • Decrease in number, yield, and nutritional value of favorable species
      • Increase in number of unfavorable species
      • Increase in soil erosion
    • Classifications of systems
      • Continuous
        • Uninterrupted grazing throughout grazing season
        • Compared to rotation
          • Lower stocking rate
          • Variable stocking rate throughout season
          • Larger pastures
        • Times of adequate yield and nutritional value, potential for productivity as rotation
        • Advantages
          • Lower fencing and watering costs
          • Lower labor costs
          • Less knowledge of forage management
        • Disadvantages
          • Variable stocking rate may be issue
          • Difficult to manage forage species
          • More difficult to harvest and store excess
          • Supplementation required to compensate for deficits
      • Intermittent (i.e. rotation)
        • Rotation: two or more pastures grazed and rested in planned sequence
        • Primary factor is time
          • Grazing and rest of forage
          • Determined by forage growth and consumption
        • Promote forage nutritional value and yield over time
        • In less productive periods, rotation systems are more productive
        • Advantages
          • Increased yield and nutritional value of forage
          • Improved stand persistence
          • Facilitates removal of excess forage
          • Increased carrying capacity of land
          • Promotes equal defoliation
          • Reduced incidence of animal disease
        • Disadvantages
          • Higher capital costs
          • Higher labor costs
          • More knowledge of forage management
        • Example: intensive rotation grazing
  • Additional forages as pasture forages
    • Rape and kale
      • Sheep
    • Beets and turnips
      • Cattle and sheep
    • Cereal grains
      • Grown as forage
      • Winter pastures
    • Crop residues
      • Include stover, chaff, straw, stalkage, and husklage
      • Figure 8.13 – Cattle grazing corn crop residue
    • Figure 8.13 - Cattle grazing corn crop residue

      • Grazed by animals with lower nutrient requirements
      • Supplementation with protein and various microminerals

 

link to previous page in the series link to next page in the series
Welcome Getting Started Resources SiteMap
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9